Cancer Nurse Navigator

Sciences

Cancer Nurse Navigator, Oncology Clinic

Date of Interview: April 4th, 2017

Transcript:

Q: So would you please state your job title, where you currently work, and how long it’s been since you graduated from college?

A: So I am a cancer nurse navigator, I work in Milwaukee, Wisconsin at a cancer care clinic, and I recently – it was May 2016 where I graduated with my bachelor’s degree.

Click here to read full transcript

About Us

About

The Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences is a project developed by two writing professors–Brian Fitzpatrick (George Mason University) and Jessica McCaughey (George Washington University)–with the aim of better understanding not only how and what kinds of writing happen in various workplaces, but also how our students will ultimately adapt when they enter the workforce.

Despite efforts to better prepare students to transfer their college writing skills to the workplace, the transition is unquestionably difficult—and often publicly lamented. One part of this challenge is that students often have surprisingly limited access to professionals working and writing in the fields they wish to pursue. Even more complicated is the tremendous variation in writing genres, requirements, and expectations from industry to industry and organization to organization, meaning that students often end up encountering a necessarily less-than-specific version of professional writing in the classroom.

In an effort to solve this problem, we developed the Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences, an online audio archive of interviews from working professionals in a variety of different industries. The archive and the research that accompanies it is grounded in “transfer” research from writing studies. Transfer is the act of learning skills in one context (in this case the university setting) and adapting or transferring them into a different context (a job). In the audio interviews collected here, interviewees are asked to discuss how and what they write in their specific workplaces, how they translated college writing skills into that field, what “successful” writing looks like where they are, and what students across disciplines need to develop in their writing as they look towards the future. Interviews also explore new ways of considering central transfer concepts like genre and metacognition.

The archive, which will be available to students, professors, and the public, serves as a learning tool and as an ongoing repository, but perhaps most importantly it is as a crucial link between the university and the “working world,” as students hear the voices of those creating real workplace writing, and are then better able to develop their own writing.

Who should use the archive?

Students
Students can use the archive as a way to learn more about the writing that happens in the fields they are considering, as well as the skills writers in these fields describe as central to their work.

Educators
Professors in various fields are welcome to use the interviews collected in the archive for any number of educational purposes, from “listening” assignments that simply offer their students access to working professionals discussing their progression as communicators in their field to more substantial writing and critical thinking exercises. In the future, our “Resources” page will house curricula, lesson plans, and other suggested uses for educators.

Employers
The archive provides employers with previously unavailable insight from individuals about what it’s like to learn to write in a given job or field. It’s our hope that employers, through both the interviews themselves and the analysis and research that stems from them, will gain a better sense of the struggles their employees face, and will be better able to implement tools, strategies, and processes to help ease that transition.

We hope the archive is valuable to you in whatever form you choose to use it, and we welcome your feedback, especially about other uses and development.

Brian Fitzpatrick: brian@workplace-writing.org
Assistant Professor, George Mason University

Jessica McCaughey: jessica@workplace-writing.org
Assistant Professor, George Washington University

AWWE Wins CCCC Emergent Researcher Award

News

Update: 1/25/2018

We are excited to announce that The Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences is a recipient of a 2018 Emergent Researchers Award, granted by the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC)!

We are so honored to have been recognized by CCCC and are so excited for what this means for the future of this project. While we are sadly not able to be in Kansas City this year to accept in person, we are thrilled and grateful to receive this award and are excited to work with CCCC in growing our project.

With this grant, the Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences will be successfully funded for at least the next two years. This means we are able to expand our research, invite more interviewees to participate, and bring our work to more students, teachers, and employers.

There are more announcements to come soon, including an expanded second phase of interviews and data collection, more opportunities to participate, new conference presentations and more.

Thank you all for your support — whether you’ve worked with us, participated in our interviews, shared/liked our page, etc, we are so grateful to have you be a part of this project.

–AWWE

Computers & Writing Conference 2018

News

We are excited to be presenting our most recent work at the 2018 Computers & Writing Conference in a panel called “Valuing the Practical Wisdom of Practitioners: How Workplace Writing Research Can Change Writing Instruction“, alongside our friends and colleagues Rachael Lussos and Prof. Heidi Lawrence. The conference will be hosted at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA, this year with a theme of Digital Phronesis: Culture/Code/Play. We hope to see you there and can’t wait to hear all of the wonderful presentations to come!

 

-AWWE

Plain Text Act Assignment

Assignments, Resources

Level: Can be customized for writers at all levels.

This assignment focuses on writing and editing for concision and clarity, particularly in the context of “public” writing. In 2010, the U.S. government put into place the Plain Writing Act, which “requires that federal agencies use clear government communication that the public can understand and use.” You can listen to a federal government employee talk about this act and its impact on his writing at work here [link to excerpt from graphic design manager at unnamed agency]. For this assignment, you’ll explore the guidelines for government employees set out in this law, and then you’ll explore government documents with these guidelines in mind.

  1. Read the guidelines (linked on the left of this page of the Plain Writing Act website).
  2. Online, find two public government documents from two different government agencies. For instance, you might look at a report from the Department of Labor about women, trauma, and disability in the workforce. You could examine the State Department’s report on Global Food Security. Or you might choose to read about one of the many research initiatives at the National Institutes for Health (NIH). Any two federal documents will work.
  3. Read your two documents and write a paragraph for each summarizing the content. What is this text about? What’s its purpose? Is it making an argument or is it simply informative? Who is the audience and how can you tell?
  4. Then, critique the writing in your two documents in the framework of the Plain Writing Act. In what ways do the texts adhere to the act? Are there places that, perhaps, seem not to be written according to these guidelines? Provide examples in your (approximately 800-word) analysis.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Major/Disciplinary Course Interview Project: Exploring a Specific Workplace Writing Situation

Assignments, Resources

Level: Upper-division Students in Major Courses (see variation for first-year students here)

In this assignment you will be conducting an interview of your own to learn more about the writing that happens in a specific workplace and position. You’ll conduct a brief (< ½ hour) interview, preferably in person, with a working professional, asking him or her about their writing and their development as a workplace writer.

Who to Interview?

Your interviewee should work in a field or job that is tied to your major—preferably in a job that you have at least some professional interest in joining post-college. Although you might know personally a seemingly great person to interview, I urge you to seek out someone you have not met in the past. The reason for this is twofold: First, if you already know them, you can ask them about their work any old time. Second, making new contacts in your desired field is always beneficial. You never know what might come of a great conversation. So, instead of interviewing a family friend, (even though interviewing him or her would be “easy”), try to expand your network. You should consider a “dream” interviewee based on your professional goals, and then use your current network to seek out professionals in that field or position. [Note to Professors: You should be prepared to offer advice for students who might need to “cold-email” a prospective interviewee. Also, an in-class networking conversation might help too. Just because Ann doesn’t know someone working her dream job, that doesn’t mean her classmate in the next row doesn’t. Allowing students to use one another as a network to seek out interviewees can do a lot of good.]

Preparing

In preparation for your interview, you should:

  1. Contact your desired interviewee (as early as possible to allow for scheduling complexities!) in a professionally written email [Note to Professors: an in-class discussion aboutthis genre and examples will serve your students well here] and schedule a time to talk, either in person (preferably) or via Skype.
  2. Listen to 2-3 interviews in the Archive (or read the transcripts). Make notes about what you learned that is relevant to you as a future workplace writer. What surprised you? What questions were the most interesting to you? What do you wish the writer had been asked?
  3. Prepare your questions. Your questions do not have to align with the questions in the Archive, but they should get at the same types of concerns, including:
    • Their job title, description, and primary duties
    • An overview of the genres the writer creates in his or her position
    • The writing process he or she follows
    • How the writer believes they learned to write in their job, including strategies or other opportunities for development
    • How he or she believes college writing prepared them (or not) to write in their current job, as well as what they wish they had learned or done as a student in order to better prepare

You should also feel free to ask other questions about the job that would help you envision yourself performing in it down the line. You should prepare approximately 8-10 open-ended questions.

  1. Prepare your recording technology and test it. (Garage Band is a good option, and iPhone recordings are also fine!)

Post-Interview

Write a summary and analysis of your interview (approximately 1,500 – 2,000 words). Provide an overview of the significant points your interviewee made, using direct quotes when useful. (A good rule of thumb to determine when to summarize or paraphrase vs. when to quote is the question: Could I say it as well as they did? If not, use their language and quote them.) Then, consider your current preparedness to do the types of writing that your interviewee performs. Are you familiar with the genres of writing they described? How would you approach one of the less familiar forms if you were tasked with writing it? What’s complicated about the genre? What seems similar or familiar to other writing tasks you have completed in the past? What questions would you need to have answered in order to successfully tackle such writing? Are there specific things you believe you can or should do, based on your conversation with this writer, to best prepare yourself for your own eventual professional writing?

[Instructor Notes: Depending on your goals, you might consider asking students to transcribe their interview, or not. You might adjust the post-interview writing to better serve your specific course objectives, and you also ask students to present (in a formal manner or not) about their findings. If not, an in-class debrief would likely benefit the class and allow them to discuss not only their findings, but also their experiences. Finally, you might also choose to add or adjust the writing assignment below.]

 

Additional Post-Interview Writing Assignment [optional]: Comparison/Contrast Essay

Now that you’ve completed your interview with a workplace writer, you’ll write a comparison/contrast piece relating it to one of the other interviews in the archive. Your audience here is other first-year writing students who want to learn about the writing that takes place in two arenas and gain a better understanding of the complexities of such writing (as well as how to best prepare to complete it).

Ultimately what we’re most interested in here is how writing genres, processes, and rhetorical situations (goals and audiences of texts, at a basic level) are similar or not between jobs. You might choose to compare your interviewee’s experiences to a writer in a similar field in the archive, or you might choose a writer that’s very different. Both options could yield interesting results.

You’ll want to be as specific as possible in your analysis, and that means honing in on one or two elements of writing transfer that interest you here. There are many directions such a paper can go, and we want a focused comparison/contrast, not a rambling list of what one person said as opposed to another person. You might consider the following questions to help you narrow your focus:

  • What genres are the two writers working within? (More on genre here.) What makes them unique to this industry/organization/position? What’s complicated about them?
  • What audiences are the two writers writing to? How does this shape their writing?
  • What are the writers attempting to accomplish in their writing?
  • How are the writers’ processes similar or not? Are differences a product of organizational constraints/opportunities or are they more personal preferences?
  • How prepared was your interviewee to enter the workforce as a writer? What kinds of experiences did they have writing in college that effected this preparedness?

Finally, you don’t want to simply tell your reader what one writer said as opposed to another writer. You want to compare your area of interestbut also provide some insight and analysis about it, including how this audience of first-year students might begin to think about their own professional writing trajectory from the university to the workplace.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

First-Year Writing Interview Project: Exploring a Specific Workplace Writing Situation

Assignments, Resources

Level: First-year Writing Students (see variation for in-major students here)

In this assignment you will be conducting an interview of your own to learn more about the writing that happens in a specific workplace and position. You’ll conduct a brief (< ½ hour) interview, preferably in person, with a working professional, asking him or her about their writing and their development as a workplace writer. Just as the Archive explores writing in a variety of fields and positions, you can too; your interviewee can do any kind of professional work (they do not need to have “writer” in their title, since we all know that writing happens in all jobs!).

Who to Interview?

Who you interview is up to you, but of course the most beneficial interview will likely be one that is conducted with a writer in a field you have at least some professional interest in joining post-college. Although you might know personally a seemingly great person to interview, I urge you to seek out someone you have not met in the past. The reason for this is twofold: First, if you already know them, you can ask them about their work any old time. Second, making new contacts in your desired field is always beneficial. You never know what might come of a great conversation. So, instead of interviewing a family friend who works in a field you’re uninterested in (even though interviewing him or her would be “easy”), try to expand your network. You should consider a “dream” interviewee based on your professional goals, and then use your current network to seek out professionals in that field or position. [Note to Professors: An in-class networking call might help too. Just because Ann doesn’t know someone working the government, that doesn’t mean her classmate in the next row doesn’t. Allowing students to use one another as a network to seek out interviewees can do a lot of good.]

Preparing

In preparation for your interview, you should:

  1. Contact your desired interviewee (as early as possible to allow for scheduling complexities!) in a professionally written email [Note to Professors: an in-class discussion aboutthis genre and examples will serve your students well here] and schedule a time to talk, either in person (preferably) or via Skype.
  2. Listen to 2-3 interviews in the Archive (or read the transcripts). Make notes about what you learned that is relevant to you as a future workplace writer. What surprised you? What questions were the most interesting to you? What do you wish the writer had been asked?
  3. Prepare your questions. Your questions do not have to align with the questions in the Archive, but they should get at the same types of concerns, including:
    • Their job title, description, and primary duties
    • An overview of the genres the writer creates in his or her position
    • The writing process he or she follows
    • How the writer believes they learned to write in their job, including strategies or other opportunities for development
    • How he or she believes college writing prepared them (or not) to write in their current job, as well as what they wish they had learned or done as a student in order to better prepare

You should also feel free to ask other questions about the job that would help you envision yourself performing in it down the line. You should prepare approximately 8-10 open-ended questions.

  1. Prepare your recording technology and test it. (Garage Band is a good option, and iPhone recordings are also fine!)

Post-Interview

Write a summary and analysis of your interview (approximately 1,500 – 2,000 words). Provide an overview of the significant points your interviewee made, using direct quotes when useful. (A good rule of thumb to determine when to summarize or paraphrase vs. when to quote is the question: Could I say it as well as they did? If not, use their language and quote them.) Then, consider your current preparedness to do the types of writing that your interviewee performs. Are you familiar with the genres of writing they described? How would you approach one of the less familiar forms if you were tasked with writing it? What’s complicated about the genre? What seems similar or familiar to other writing tasks you have completed in the past? What questions would you need to have answered in order to successfully tackle such writing? Are there specific things you believe you can or should do, based on your conversation with this writer, to best prepare yourself for your own eventual professional writing?

[Instructor Notes: Depending on your goals, you might consider asking students to transcribe their interview, or not. You might adjust the post-interview writing to better serve your specific course objectives, and you also ask students to present (in a formal manner or not) about their findings. If not, an in-class debrief would likely benefit the class and allow them to discuss not only their findings, but also their experiences. Finally, you might also choose to add or adjust the writing assignment below.]

 

Additional Post-Interview Writing Assignment [optional]: Comparison/Contrast Essay

Now that you’ve completed your interview with a workplace writer, you’ll write a comparison/contrast piece relating it to one of the other interviews in the archive. Your audience here is other first-year writing students who want to learn about the writing that takes place in two arenas and gain a better understanding of the complexities of such writing (as well as how to best prepare to complete it).

Ultimately what we’re most interested in here is how writing genres, processes, and rhetorical situations (goals and audiences of texts, at a basic level) are similar or not between jobs. You might choose to compare your interviewee’s experiences to a writer in a similar field in the archive, or you might choose a writer that’s very different. Both options could yield interesting results.

You’ll want to be as specific as possible in your analysis, and that means honing in on one or two elements of writing transfer that interest you here. There are many directions such a paper can go, and we want a focused comparison/contrast, not a rambling list of what one person said as opposed to another person. You might consider the following questions to help you narrow your focus:

  • What genres are the two writers working within? (More on genre here.) What makes them unique to this industry/organization/position? What’s complicated about them?
  • What audiences are the two writers writing to? How does this shape their writing?
  • What are the writers attempting to accomplish in their writing?
  • How are the writers’ processes similar or not? Are differences a product of organizational constraints/opportunities or are they more personal preferences?
  • How prepared was your interviewee to enter the workforce as a writer? What kinds of experiences did they have writing in college that effected this preparedness?

Finally, you don’t want to simply tell your reader what one writer said as opposed to another writer. You want to compare your area of interestbut also provide some insight and analysis about it, including how this audience of first-year students might begin to think about their own professional writing trajectory from the university to the workplace.

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Recording and Submitting Your Experience to the Archive

Submit Your Own Experience

Note: There are multiple ways and programs out there to record one’s own voice. If you have a preferred method, please feel free to use it! Please save your file as a .mp3, .m4a or a .wav. Then, skip down to the “How to Submit” section below.

 

General Tips

  • Before beginning to record, you’ll want to open up and read through the archive questionnaire so that you’re familiar with the questions before you begin. Have these ready to go as you begin to record.
  • It’s best to find a quiet room where you won’t be interrupted for approximately 20 – 30 minutes, which is the typical amount of time the questionnaire takes to answer.
  • Most people have a tendency to speak quickly when they are being recorded. Try to speak slowly and as clearly as possible.
  • Once you are recording, please be sure to read aloud each interview question exactly as it appears on the questionnaire <link> before answering it. Remember, you are acting as both the interviewer and the interviewee!

 

How to Record Yourself on a Mac  

  1. QuickTime is an easy recording program that’s included on most Macs. To open it, go to Finder > Applications, and then choose QuickTime.
  2. Once you’ve opened the program, go to File, and choose “New Audio Recording.”
  3. When you are ready to begin, click the red “Record” circle button.
  4. Once you are recording, please be sure to read aloud each interview question exactly as it appears on the questionnaire before answering it. Remember, you are acting as both the interviewer and the interviewee!
  5. When you have completed the last question, click the red “Record” circle button again to stop recording.
  6. Go to “File,” and then “Save.”
  7. Save the file as “YourLastName_Date.” Be sure to save it somewhere convenient for you to attach and send.

All finished? Jump down to the “How to Submit Your File” section below for final instructions.

 

How to Record Yourself on an iPhone

Recording your interview on an iPhone is also an option, and it’s relatively straightforward. But it’s important to note that audio files take up a lot of space. If you’d like to use an iPhone for your interview and you have the space to spare, you can find very helpful instructions here. When it’s time to send us your file, note that you will tap the “share” button, which looks like a box with an arrow shooting out of the top.

 

How to Submit Your File

Please attach and email your file to brian@workplace-writing.org and jessica@workplace-writing.org. Please be aware that audio files are often quite large, and so your email might ask you, if you are using a form of Gmail, if you’d like to attach the file using Google Drive and share it. This works just fine! If you have any problems or questions, don’t hesitate to contact us at the addresses above.

Waiver of Consent

Submit Your Own Experience

You are being asked to take part in a research study about how transfer writing skills and knowledge from college into the workplace.

What the study is about: The purpose of this study is to learn how individuals in different fields perceive the ways they’ve learned to write in both the academe and the workplace, and the ways in which skills from the former inform the latter. In addition to being used as “data” for research on this transfer of skills, the interviews conducted during this project will also be made publically available here, on the archive, as a disciplinary resource for students, faculty, and other workplace writers.

How will the interviews be used: Interviews collected here will primarily be used within this archive, but may also be used in future publications about this project and its results.

What we will ask you to do: If you agree to participate, you will be asked to talk about your job, the tasks you perform that relate to writing, and how you understand your acquisition of your writing skills. (If you would like to participate, you will be given both technical guidance and a guide of questions.)

Rights: Your participation in this archive collection is entirely voluntary. You may withdraw your consent and discontinue at any time.

Risks and benefits: We do not anticipate any risks to you participating in this study other than those encountered in day-to-day life. There may be no benefits to you personally, but the information we collect will, we hope, benefit future college students and new workplace writers.

Confidentiality: Because of the nature of this project, which involves building an audio archive of interviews with writers in different fields, your answers will not be confidential. You may choose to use only your full name, only your first name, or a pseudonym, but the details of your work or your voice may make it possible for listeners to identify you; therefore, if you are not comfortable with being publically attached to these answers, please do not participate.

Taking part is voluntary: Taking part in this study is completely voluntary, and you are entitled to skip any questions that you are not comfortable answering. You may also decide to cancel and negate your participation at any time during or after the interview. If you submit an interview but then later decide that you would like to withdraw it, you can contact us (contact information below) at any time and we will remove it.

If you have questions: This study is being conducted by Jessica McCaughey (George Washington University) and Brian Fitzpatrick (George Mason University). If you have questions prior to submitting or after, you may contact Professor Fitzpatrick at bfitzpa2@gmu.edu or Professor McCaughey at jessmcc@gwu.edu. You may contact the George Mason University Office of Research Integrity & Assurance at 703-993-4121 and/or the George Washington University Office of Human Research at 202-994-2715 if you have questions or comments regarding your rights as a participant in the research.

 

Your willingness to participate in this research study is implied if you proceed.   

Title of Study: Archive of Workplace Writing Experiences

IRB #:   081638 (GWU)

Principal Investigator Names: Jessica McCaughey and Brian Fitzpatrick

 

Click here for easy instructions on recording and submitting your experience.

Interview Questionnaire

uncategorized
  1. Would you please state your job title, where you currently work, and how long it’s been since you graduated from college?  (Note: If you’d rather not name your employer, you are welcome to simply offer a broad description of the organization.)
  2. Can you provide a very brief description of your primary job functions?
  3. How frequently are you required to write? Can you please estimate, in an average week, what percentage of your job requires writing?
  4. What forms or types of writing or kinds of documents do you most often complete? (If the participant requires clarification: “For example, memos, emails, reports…”) Who are the primary audiences? What are the primary purposes of these communications?
  5. Can you describe a time in your career that you felt unprepared as a writer at work? How did you handle that situation?
  6. What kinds of writing were you asked to create as a student? In what ways do you think your academic background prepared or did not prepare you to write in the workplace?
  7. Please describe your writing process, including how writing “assignments” or tasks are given to you, preparation, and the steps you take from the start of the project to completion. If useful, you might walk us through the process for one specific recent project or type of project.
  8. If your documents go through revisions or multiple drafts, how do you approach making these changes or improving your writing from one draft to the next?
  9. How long you do typically have to complete a writing project?
  10. What is at stake in your writing?
  11. How do you believe you have evolved or improved as a writer, if at all, over your career so far?
  12. Who oversees your writing? Could you give us a brief description of their title and role in the organization? How would you say they judge the success/quality of your writing?
  13. What practical steps did you take in the office to overcome early writing challenges? (If they hesitate, suggest: “For example, looking at documents by other writers in the office, asking questions of more senior writers, or seeking out professional training.”).
  14. Have you had any writing training or education since graduating from college?
  15. What is the most difficult thing about writing in your field and/or your specific position?
  16. Would you say that you’re a successful workplace writer? Why or why not?
  17. What skills do you think are most central to writing in your specific role, organization, and industry/field?